A recent article in the Wall Street Journal notes that as of May 26, 77 percent of the 485 companies in the S&P 500 that had reported earnings beat earnings, compared to the historical rate of 66 percent. What is even more surprising is that the earnings beats are 6.9 percent above expectations, compared to a 4.1 percent historical average. But accounting choices, which have been labeled as potential earnings manipulation, may be the cause. For example, Google extended the life of its server infrastructure from four years to six years. The extension added 6 cents per share to earnings due to lower depreciation. The company also shifted employee stock awards from January to March, which also increased reported earnings. And Carvana, which was expected to lose $2.03 per share only lost $1.51 per share. The company had taken charges in the previous quarter when used car prices had plummeted and expected to sell cars for less. When used car prices increases, the company unwound those loses, increasing earnings per share by $.48, almost all of the earnings beat.
Sunday, June 4, 2023
Accounting Fiction?
Wednesday, March 17, 2021
Cash Versus Earnings
A recent article in the Wall Street Journal notes that banks sharply increased their loan loss reserves in 2020 in response to the pandemic. Increasing such reserves reduces a bank’s reported profit, and decreasing them improves the profit picture. By 2021, the loan losses had not emerged at the level the banks anticipated, so their profits will be rising as the loan reserves are decreased. According to the WSJ, “U.S. banks are sitting on a pile of cash that could turn into billions of dollars of profits.” There’s only one problem. Loan loss reserves are just accounting entries. Increasing and decreasing them impacts reported profits, but has no cash flow implications. As JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said "It's ink on paper . . .we don't consider that earnings." We recommend a review of Chapter 2 for the WSJ reporter.
Wednesday, May 27, 2020
Book Value Versus Market Value
"A major factor in the timing of the bankruptcy filing was the $389.5 million monthly lease payment that included an additional $135 million "true-up" payment for difference between the depreciated value compared to the book depreciated value."
If you read this carefully, the timing of the bankruptcy was chosen because Hertz car rental could not make the additional payment of $135 million to account for the difference between the book value and market value of the cars it leased from Hertz Vehicle Financing. In other words, the combined market value of the cars leased by Hertz car rental was $135 million less than book value.